"To Become, to progress, to hunger, to fuel the Inner Flame without my own emotions playing against True Will."
How do you view the relationship between your emotions, intellect, and True Will?
"Unlike the RHP, I follow basic LHP principals focusing on Individualism, Self as God, and the older darker primal forces of spirituality. In easier words, Luciferian."
This is interesting: What is the "Self" to you? Moreover, by "darker primal forces" do you mean instinctual forces or something in one way or another, significantly different? While I do also place a premium on individualism, I personally cannot realistically appropriate for myself the traditional attributes of a deity, nor have I ever been acquainted with or heard of anyone who credibly could. Perhaps I am biased here, as I do lean towards a theological model--although let me be clear, it does not originate in a commitment to the worn out old religions, but rather a theophanic experience from my adolescence that I reintegrated into memory during an intensive regimen of ritual work back in 2006.
"What you said about NeoPlatoism resonates well with me. Do you have any solid resources on that philosophy?"
Fortunately, there has been a recent surge of interest in Neoplatonism and related subfields over the last decade or so among classicists, thus there is a quickly accumulating corpus of both secondary literature and translations of primary texts. If you would like to get your feet wet by reading primary text material, then I would recommend either Plotinus' Enneads or a compilation of excerpts from the whole spectrum of authors recently released by John Dillon, I think it is called Neoplatonism: Introductory Readings. If, however, you are looking to first pique your interest further before making a study commitment (the nuances of Neoplatonic thought are notoriously difficult), then I would recommend connecting your inquiries to your already established magical interests, in which case, I cannot recommend too highly Iamblichus' On the Mysteries--I have to say it, De Mysteriis is, in my opinion, the single best theoretical treastise on high magic ever written, anywhere, by anyone (I should probably also note that Ken Wilber, who is otherwise obsessively sympathetic with Eastern traditions, refers to Plotinus as the greatest mystical philosopher of all time). I think at Twilit Grotto you can find Talyor's largely unintelligible translation of De Mysteriis (the Clark, Dillon, Hershbell translation is in many ways superb, but it is not online), as well as a decent translation of Proclus' Elements of Theology--though I do not recommend the latter as a starting text.
If, however, you would like first to familiarize yourself with the basic ideas from secondary literature, I think you might be able to find Whitaker's Neoplatonism online at archive.org--but you could also just go to the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and look up 'Neoplatonism'. (But of course, you are already familiar with at least some philosophical principles drawn from Neoplatonic authors, as Neoplatonism serves as the philosophical foundation for Christian, Islamic, and Jewish mysticism.)
Bookmarks