This is a tough question for me to answer. If I would take Hermetics and Qabalah as an example, you could read significant works in translation (the Zohar, the Sepher Yetzirah), you could read academic works about those significant works, or you could read books that are more, 'popularized.' There really isn't anything wrong with popularized, but it's not the significant stuff.
Typical beginner's books are books like Tyson's, 'The Magician's Workbook,' or Donald Michael Kraig's, 'Modern Magick.' Other examples would be the Scott Cunningham books on contemporary witchcraft. Another group of books are Liber Null, Psychonaut, and Liber Kaos by Peter Carroll, as well as Kondensed Kaos by Phil Hine. Those are more popularized types of books, but none of those books is a total loser.
In my own opinion, the meat of the tradition is in significant books. I tend to read mostly translations of archaic texts and academic commentaries. In terms of practice, I do mostly artistic work, or meditation and meditative exercise. So - I guess it depends on what, 'start,' might mean to you.
"... And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free..."
Bookmarks