Thread: Luciferia

Originally Posted by EtuMalku

Kemetically speaking I see Satan aligning more with Set, who would be the 'adversary' of Osiris. Sethians are associated closer to Satan from what I know.

Satan is a personification of the Judaic word al-satan (who borrowed it from the Persians' Shaiten) meaning adversary. The word is used more as a descriptive noun or pronoun. A fallen tree preventing a husband from getting to his injured wife would be considered a tree of shaiten, more or less.
Shaiten did not become Satan until much later where Jewish sects / tribes such as the Essenes began referring to anyone not an Essene as a Shaiten. Still further the Roman Christian church decided it was time to personify shaiten into Satan and have Him become the scapegoat for all evil in the Christian world.

satan has more to do with opiates, and christianity is a white opiate and set more to do with channelling than being an enemy of the egyptian god of gardening osiris,
lucifer to me seems to have more to do with the elesunian/bacchic mysteries and baphomet if he is called son of the morning
wrong!

what about christians and the devil? very interesting hmmm

Originally Posted by EtuMalku

Kemetically speaking I see Satan aligning more with Set, who would be the 'adversary' of Osiris. Sethians are associated closer to Satan from what I know.

Satan is a personification of the Judaic word al-satan (who borrowed it from the Persians' Shaiten) meaning adversary. The word is used more as a descriptive noun or pronoun. A fallen tree preventing a husband from getting to his injured wife would be considered a tree of shaiten, more or less.
Shaiten did not become Satan until much later where Jewish sects / tribes such as the Essenes began referring to anyone not an Essene as a Shaiten. Still further the Roman Christian church decided it was time to personify shaiten into Satan and have Him become the scapegoat for all evil in the Christian world.

I think I read on the temple of set's site that the jews in Egypt took the God Set and made Set-hen or Satan from it.

I didnt read all the posts, but only the first one and I have these comments:

1. Bible's Lucifer (The One mentioned in Isaiah, Ezekiel and Revelation) is NOT a rebel. He is not an angel who wanted freedom. He didnt just wish to dethrone God... He wished to dethrone God and be God Himself though He already had enough power and as we read in Revelation Alpha, He was the strongest and wisest Archangel of them all. But He wanted even more.... It was then that He created the first deadly sin of the world... "Ambition". So He actually is an adversary.

2. There is a problem here... You said that you believe Lucifer is the Serpent of Eden but He is not Satan right? This means you believe He is not the Great Dragon of Revelation... Well, He is. John says clairly that the Great Dragon is the Ancient Serpent, Satan, Devil and the He who deceived the whole universe. So, you cannot claim Lucifer is the Ancient Serpent and Satan is not... If you believe Lucifer is not Satan then you have to believe that He is not the Ancient Serpent neither, because the Ancient Serpent IS ACTUALLY THE DEVIL.

You may believe that the Devil did good by giving the knowledge of Good and Evil to humans, but in fact He did it just to rule over humans and make them turn against God, their Creator and get away from Him.

3. I'm sure you actually dont believe in the Bible and you just use these as symbols. Am I right? Because thats what everyone does and then claims he is a Luciferian / Satanist. Hope you are not one of these atheists of course...

Hey hey! I know this is kinda an old topic to be commenting on, but as I'm new and just read it, I feel compelled to so so anyway.

For some reason, I don't see your post (OP) as something to "agree with" or "disagree with," as some others seem to do. It was your POV. I hardly see how I can say "that isn't your POV," like I know what you're thinking.

Anyway, I thought it was a great read, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I find your ability to write quite impressive.